New results from a trial in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma offer some answers to questions about which treatment route to choose.
The trial, known as DETERMINATION, found that newly diagnosed patients treated with a triplet of drugs had longer progression-free survival (PFS) if they received an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) soon after the drug therapy than if they simply had their stem cells collected for a possible future transplant.
Patients who received the triplet of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) plus ASCT had a median PFS of 67.5 months, compared with 46.2 months for those who received RVD but did not have a transplant soon after.
However, patients were just as likely to be alive more than 6 years after treatment regardless of whether or not they underwent an immediate stem cell transplant.
In addition, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or above were higher in the group that received the transplant immediately after the triplet therapy.
The results were presented here during a plenary session at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2022 annual meeting and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
"Our findings confirm the PFS benefit of transplantation as first-line treatment for patients with myeloma and confirms stem cell transplant as a standard of care with certain triplet therapy," said lead author Paul Richardson, MD, professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School and clinical program leader and director of clinical research at the Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Another finding from the trial was that the use of maintenance lenalidomide in both groups continuously until progression conferred substantial clinical benefit.
"We can also say that the use of lenalidomide maintenance therapy is also a standard of care," he added.
In this trial, Richardson and colleagues randomly assigned 873 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma to the RVD-alone group (n = 357) or the transplantation group (n = 365). All patients had received one cycle of RVD prior to randomization and then received two additional RVD cycles plus stem-cell mobilization followed by either five additional RVD cycles (the RVD-alone group) or high-dose melphalan plus ASCT followed by two additional RVD cycles (the transplantation group). Lenalidomide was administered to all patients until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or both.
At a median follow-up of 76.0 months, the risk of disease progression or death was 53% higher among patients who received RVD alone versus the transplantation group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; P < .001). The median duration of PFS among patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile was 55.5 vs 17.1 months, favoring the transplantation group.
The percentage of patients who were alive without progression at 5 years was 58.4% vs 41.6%, respectively (HR, 1.66) and median duration of response was 56.4 vs 38.9 months, also favoring transplantation (HR, 1.45).
The estimated 5-year overall survival was similar between groups: 80.7% for transplantation and 79.2% for RVD alone (HR for death, 1.10; P > .99). For patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile, 5-year survival was 63.4% versus 54.3%, respectively.
"This tells us that for patients who had kept transplant in reserve, they had the same overall survival as those who had had a transplant right away, despite there being such impressive initial disease control for the patients in whom transplant was used early," Richardson commented in a press release from his institution.
Patients who did not undergo immediate transplant received treatment when their disease progressed with newer and active therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies and/or next-generation novel agents, he noted. Only 28% of patients used the reserve option of a transplant.
"It demonstrates the extent to which patients now have options and that we have new data to guide them in balancing the pluses and minuses of each approach," he added.
When looking at safety, the authors noted that the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 279 patients (78.2%) in the RVD-alone group and 344 patients (94.2%) in the transplantation group. Of those patients, 60.5% and 89.9%, respectively, reported hematologic events of grade 3 or higher (P < .001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of invasive second primary cancers was similar in both cohorts (RVD-alone group, 4.9%; transplantation group, 6.5%).
However, while the risk of secondary cancers was similar between groups, Richardson noted that there was a higher incidence of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in the transplant cohort.
"There was also a significant drop in quality of life across transplant procedures, but the good news is that it was recoverable rapidly," he said. "What is also really important is that we have prospective, multicenter, national comparative data on toxicity. That's very important for providing patients with a choice as they move forward with their treatment plan."
He also noted that treatment continues to evolve. "This study was designed in 2009, begun in 2010, and now there is mature data in 2022," Richardson commented. "This is particularly relevant as we have now further improved the induction treatment for younger patients with newly diagnosed myeloma using quadruplet regimens incorporating monoclonal antibodies and novel next-generation therapies. The results from these studies are extremely exciting."
"Now more than ever, treatment for multiple myeloma can be adapted for each patient," Richardson commented. "Our study provides important information about the benefits of transplant in the era of highly effective novel therapies and continuous maintenance, as well as the potential risks, to help patients and their physicians decide what approach may be best for them. This is particularly relevant as we have now further improved the induction treatment for younger patients with newly diagnosed myeloma using quadruplet regimens incorporating monoclonal antibodies, such as RVD combined with daratumumab."
Lack of Difference in Overall Survival
These new results further support an already established role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the management of patients with multiple myeloma, said Samer Al-Homsi, MD, MBA, clinical professor of medicine and director of the blood and marrow transplant program at Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York City, who was approached for comment.
"The treatment regimen is applicable to patients who are determined by an expert in transplantation to be fit to receive autologous hematopoietic transplantation," he added. "Although this study, like many others, establishes hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as part of the standard of care in multiple myeloma, only a fraction of patients are actually offered this important modality of treatment for a variety of reasons, including provider bias," he noted. "In fact, although improvement in supportive care has enhanced the safety of the procedure, many patients are denied this therapy."
Al-Homsi also noted that the lack of difference in overall survival might be due to the fact that some patients (28%) in the RVD alone group did end up undergoing transplantation at the time of progression. "Also, longer follow-up might reveal a difference in overall survival," he said.
The toxicities are manageable, and the incidence of secondary malignancies was not significantly different between cohorts. "However," he emphasized, "lenalidomide has been associated in other studies with increased incidence of secondary malignancies and it must be noted that this study used extended administration of lenalidomide until progression."
Timing of Transplant Can Be Individualized
Invited discussant Joseph Mikhael, MD, from the City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California, noted that a key take-home message is that this is a positive study demonstrating that "transplant prolongs PFS and transplant remains a viable and valuable component of therapy in eligible patients in multiple myeloma."
"Similar overall survival in multiple trials of early versus delayed [disease] means that the timing of transplant can be individualized based on a number of factors including age, patient preference, risk status, and feasibility," he said.
Mikhael emphasized that transplant comes with both short- and long-term toxicities that must be discussed with the patient and mitigated. "Maintenance therapy until progression remains an important part of myeloma therapy," he said.
While ASCT remains very relevant and important in prolonging PFS in younger and eligible patients, "it may not be mandatory in all eligible patients upfront," he said. "As with other agents, we individualize the sequencing pattern. The 'prix fixe' menu has now become a more flexible menu."
As for future directions, Mikhael pointed out that regimens are already moving beyond VRd/KRd triplets to quadruplets such as DARA-VRd, isatuximab-VRd, and both D-KRd and I-KRd." We may no longer be immediately dividing patients into transplant eligible versus transplant ineligible," he said. "We will likely incorporate more immunotherapy in frontline myeloma and early phase trials are already underway."
"I can see a day with more limited use of ASCT," he added.
Support for this study was provided by grants to the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Cancer Institute, R.J. Corman Multiple Myeloma Foundation, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, and Millennium/Takeda Pharmaceutical. Richardson has reported relationships with Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Secura Bio, Takeda, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Al-Homsi has reported no relevant financial relationships.
ASCO 2022. Abstract LBA4. Presented June 5, 2022
N Engl J Med. Published online June 5, 2022. Full text
Lead image: iStock / Getty Images
Medscape Medical News © 2022 WebMD, LLC
Send comments and news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Cite this: First-Line Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma - Medscape - Jun 05, 2022.