Laird Harrison

March 18, 2016

SAN FRANCISCO — An 8-week regimen of the combination of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir (Harvoni, Gilead Sciences) could be an option for many patients with hepatitis C, even those who don't meet the approved criteria for the shortened regime, new research shows.

Most clinicians still prescribe the combination for 12 or 24 weeks, said Norah Terrault, MD, from the University of California, San Francisco. But the drugs are expensive, so an 8-week regimen saves money and it cuts down on patient visits.

"We should be doing more of it," she told Medscape Medical News.

The 8-week regimen has been approved for treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection, no cirrhosis, and viral loads below 6 million IU/mL by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency.

Still, some clinicians can be reluctant to prescribe such a short regimen because of concern that trial results will not be reflected in a real-world practice, she said.

To see if that is cause for concern, Dr Terrault and her colleagues compared results from ION-3, a clinical trial of the 8-week regimen, with five real-world studies — HCV-TARGET, TRIO, and VA-Ohio from the United States, and the GECCO and Buggisch studies from Germany.

Dr Terrault presented the results of the comparison here at the International Conference on Viral Hepatitis 2016.

ION-3 Patients

The post hoc analysis of ION-3 data involved 123 patients who met the FDA-approved criteria for and completed an 8-week regimen of the combination, and a matched cohort of 126 patients who completed a 12-week regimen. Sustained viral response at 12 weeks was essentially the same with the 8-week and 12-week regimens (97% vs 96%). Relapse rates were also similar with the two regimens.

But there were ION-3 patients who did not meet the FDA-approved criteria who still fared well with the 8-week regimen, Dr Terrault reported. For patients with a viral load above 6 million IU/mL, a sustained viral response at 12 weeks was achieved by 95% of patients who received ribavirin in addition to the combination, and by 100% of patients who did not receive ribavirin. Results for patients with fibrosis up to stage 3 were just as good.

TARGET Patients

In the TARGET cohort, 323 patients met the criteria for the 8-week regimen, but 192 were assigned by their physicians to a 12-week regimen. This shows how underused the 8-week regimen is, Dr Terrault pointed out. The rate of sustained viral response at 12 weeks was the same with the 8-week and the 12-week regimens (97% vs 97%).

Not all TARGET patients treated with the 8-week regimen met the FDA criteria. Six of the 154 patients (those with incomplete data were excluded from the previous analysis) had stage 4 fibrosis, and eight had received previous treatment.

And in the TRIO cohort, eight of the 263 patients had viral loads above 6 million IU/mL.

Evidence Mounting

The GECCO study involved the most patients who did not meet the FDA criteria: seven patients were coinfected with HIV, three had stage 4 fibrosis, 12 had been previously treated, and nine had a high viral load. But all of these patients achieved a sustained viral response at 12 weeks.

Overall, in the five real-world studies, a combined 620 patients had a sustained viral response at 12 weeks of 97% or better with the 8-week regimen.

It's compelling to see it across so many studies.

"It's compelling to see it across so many studies," said Dr Terrault. "I think this will encourage more providers to do the 8 weeks."

It is possible that the viral load specified in the criteria should be higher. "Six million seems like an arbitrary cutoff," she said, but limiting the 8-week regimen to treatment-naïve patients with no cirrhosis seems sensible.

Failure rates in all studies of a 6-week regimen have been high, she reported.

After the presentation, a member of the audience described a case of failure with the 8-week regimen, but it turned out that physicians had overlooked the patient's cirrhosis because they did not have an elastography machine.

Clinicians who don't have access to elastography equipment have to rely on serum biomarkers, "which we know can work both ways — overestimating and underestimating fibrosis," Dr Terrault explained.

"We actually spend a lot of time educating our providers about using the various scores to help make that decision," she said. "But I think the message we leave them with is that if you're unsure and you think there could be a higher stage, err on the side of treating them for 12 weeks."

Another audience member asked whether the treatment failures in these studies were related to a lack of adherence or to virologic failures.

Dr Terrault reported that treatment adherence was very high and that the treatment failures appeared to be related to relapses.

These findings "add reassurance" for clinicians using this regimen in patients who meet the criteria, session moderator Ji-Dong Jia, MD, PhD, from Capital Medical University in Beijing, told Medscape Medical News.

Dr Terrault reports relationships with AbbVie, Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Cocrystal, and UpToDate. Dr Jia reports relationships with AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Roche Laboratories.

International Conference on Viral Hepatitis (ICVH) 2016: Abstract 25. Presented March 14, 2016.


Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.